Practical Tests for a Moral Society

When societies come under strain, the impulse to fracture along national or geographic lines can be powerful. It is more than an impulse – the reversion to protect our own is visceral. (At least that is how I experience it). Yet political nationalism often turns attachment to home into suspicion of neighbours and contempt for minorities. Societies do not heal by narrowing belonging. Renewal requires cooperative, structural policies that address the root of collective anger: severe economic abandonment.

The scale of that abandonment is stark. In Great Britain, the wealthiest 10% of households held £1,200,500 or more in wealth in 2020–22, while the least wealthy 10% held £16,500 or less. In the UK, the richest 56 people now hold more wealth than 27 million people combined. Faced with such insecurity, political leaders too often divert anger towards migrants, minorities, or neighbouring nations rather than confronting structural injustice.

Two Tests for a Just Society

To move beyond blame and judge how we should rebuild, two moral tests are useful.

The first is John Rawls’s “veil of ignorance”. Rawls asks us to design society without knowing whether we will be born rich or poor, powerful or powerless. From that position, no just society would allow vast wealth to accumulate at the top while millions live in insecurity. Inequality is tolerable only when it benefits the least well-off.

The second is Christ’s warning: “By their fruits ye shall know them.” It requires us to judge politicians and economic systems not by patriotic rhetoric, but by their effects on human dignity.

Judging the Recent Past by Its Fruits

Applying these tests to recent UK governments—assessed roughly a decade after they left power—reveals stark differences in outcome:

 Margaret Thatcher: She came to power on the back of economic turmoil arising from industrial dispute under the previous labour government. This era prioritised market deregulation over protections for the least advantaged, contradicting the Rawlsian premise. Its fruits included a sharp rise in inequality: overall poverty rose to around one in four people by the mid-1990s, pensioner poverty increased from 13% to 43%, and child poverty more than doubled.

 Tony Blair: New Labour raised the economic floor through the minimum wage and increased social investment. Child poverty fell by around 600,000 children, and absolute pensioner poverty declined significantly. Yet overall income inequality barely shifted, as top incomes continued to rise. Alas, the end result was economic destitution.

 David Cameron: Austerity eroded support for the least well-off, placing much of the burden of fiscal consolidation on vulnerable communities. Central government funding for local authorities fell by over 50% in real terms between 2010–11 and 2020–21. The consequences include persistent child poverty and long-term damage to public health, reflected in British 19-year-old boys falling from 28th to 39th in global height rankings between 1985 and 2019.

The Time Horizon of Justice

For structural repair to last, it needs to be build on strong and practical foundations. There are no short cuts. Did the Russian revolution, with all of it’s bloodshed lead to a just society – or new Czars by another name? Redistribution, or any major policy shift, must be phased over a measured time horizon so that we can build on what is working amongst our own peoples. A Rawlsian society raises the floor through gradual uplift, not abrupt and punitive extraction.

Radical, yes – but not sudden. There are calls to levy immediate taxes on pockets of wealth. Oil and banking could simply depart. Sudden extraction from income-poor pensioners would force many to sell their settled home in their old age. It is the fear of such changes that provokes fierce resistance. A long-term, generational vision of fairness avoids punitive shocks and is more likely to command the broad public support needed for durable change.

To reverse the damage of the last decade, we must recognise that geographic and constitutional rifts—whether North versus South or Scottish and Welsh separatism—distract from a shared condition of economic abandonment. They drain energy from housing, education, and social care, serving those who benefit from a divided working class.

Rather than divide the map, a better politics must widen belonging. Practical Christian socialism—grounded in solidarity, the dignity of labour, and carefully managed redistribution—can offer both moral clarity and broad public appeal. By rejecting scapegoating and committing to cooperative repair, we can build a society that passes the test of its fruits.

Therefore, ask yourself..

Who should we lend our vote to? We only have the words, rather than actions of politicians, so we can only guess at the fruits. We can though look to similar politicians in the past and judge where they led.  I, personally would not support anyone who appeals to division – any kind of nationalism, to self-interest or who canvas our vote on the basis of blaming the “other”.

Is there a way in which which compassionate policies can be allied to practical economic management? Let us hope so.

References

 Bible: The Gospel According to Matthew, 7:16. (King James Version).

 Oxfam GB (2026): Billionaire wealth jumps three times faster in 2025 to highest peak ever. (Corresponds to the claim about the richest 56 people holding more wealth than 27 million people combined).

 Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) (2013 / Various Years): Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK. (Corresponds to historical poverty rate changes during the Thatcher and Blair administrations).

 Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) (2024): UK Poverty Report. (Corresponds to data on child poverty rates and the impact of the 2010s austerity programme).

 Local Government Association (LGA) (2020): Local government funding: moving the conversation on. (Corresponds to the 40% reduction in central government funding for local authorities).

 NCD-Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) (2020): Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries. The Lancet. (Corresponds to the drop in global height rankings for British 19-year-old boys).

 Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2025): Household total wealth in Great Britain: April 2020 to March 2022. (Corresponds to the £1,200,500 vs £16,500 household wealth statistics).

 Rawls, J. (1971): A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Corresponds to the “veil of ignorance” philosophical framework).

Alternative Zionism

I believe that the current state of Israel is a tragedy that could have been avoided; and a wasted opportunity.There was (and is?) an alternative. This was set out by Martin Buber, whose book “I and Thou” set up the Philosophy of Relation. He opposed the views of Weizmann and Ben Gurion. Essentially his vision was for the cooperative development of respectful, peaceful, equal and creative society between Jews and Arabs.

In 1925 he co-founded Brith Shalom – The Covenant of Peace – which set out this vision. He fled Austria and Germany during the Nazi holocaust, but persisted with this message. In his 1947 tract “Questions and Answers. The Jewish Settlement of Palestine” he directly addressed the potential for conflict and advocated a path of peace, respect and deep listening. He deplored Jewish terrorism (for instance the attack on the King David Hotel). His vision was for restriction of Jewish immigration, a mutually interdependent society with a common economy for all – Arabs and Jew alike, and the creative growth of a new nation by the efforts and for the benefit of all.

He saw the land between the Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea as a melting pot. Where peoples and cultures could meet and thrive creatively. Where East, West, South and North could come together. A nexus. This view was perhaps natural to his family. They were Hasidic Jews from melting pot of the Polish-Lithuanian Common Wealth. The country that was once the largest in Europe and which stretched from the Baltic to the Black Sea with cultural centres in Poland and Ukraine.

A history of thought and listening and in many languages. Martin Buber spoke and read German, Hebrew, Yiddish, Polish, English, French, Italian, Spanish, Latin, Greek and Dutch.

It is a tragedy for the world that this path was not followed.

Find out more about Martin Buber at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Buber




Nationalism. A poor show.

Nationalism impoverishes everyone, and in every way. Economically, politically, culturally, morally

It does this economically, by closing minds and borders. Two examples. Scotland right now. See the table. A deficit of 12% to GDP. I think as a direct result of the uncertainty around the continuing almost-religious drive for “Independence”. This results directly in loss of investment; flowing from uncertainty – with Scotland facing bankruptcy on the first day. The second example is Nazi Germany – where Hitler’s persecution led to the emigration of those Jewish scientists who’s inventiveness created an explosion of growth elsewhere, for instance in the USA.

Morally? Certainly populists create and use an “enemy” in order to keep themselves in power. Whether the enemy is the Ukraine (Russia), England (Scotland), Brussels (England), Palestine (Israel) is not the point. This is an appeal to our animal instincts and to fear. This seems to me to be morally indefensible. It’s certainly not Kantian (do good, for the sake of doing good), nor is it “do as you would be done to”, nor Christian – “love thy neighbour as thyself”. It only benefits politicians who use this to gain and remain in power.

.. and consider the political consequences of nationalism – here in my own geography. Brexit has separated us from friends in Europe. We “took back control”, but the question is – “to do what?” The SNP has replaced Labour in the UK parliament. The result has been the creation of two one-party states. Conservative rule in the United Kingdom, SNP in Scotland. The result has been division and intolerance throughout these islands. If the SNP are now in decline – hooray. Perhaps we may see a socialist government throughout the whole of this land, and a route back to sense and sensibility (fairness). I hope so.

Lastly, nationalism brings with it cultural desertification.Where is the continuity of Russian literature, music, dance in the febrile atmosphere of supposed national defence against those “aggressors” – the Ukrainians? Where is the cultural dividend from Brexit; and – for heavens sake – what would be the consequence of a bankrupt tartan-wrapped Scottish Nation? Not so much Burns and Burnt-out. And the shame of it is Scotland helped forge other British and international traditions. The Scottish Enlightenment. British Chartists meeting on Glasgow Green. Keir Hardie and International Socialism. Outward- facing toward a brotherhood of man.

Nationalism. In any form, brings with it poverty. Reject it, I beg you.

Nationalism. A Poor Show.

Political Vibration

There is always difference of opinion. Consciousness requires boundary; an other must be established in order for there to be a conscious self. An “I” (Ich) requires a dance with a “Thou” (Du). Reality is the dynamic balance that results from the interplay of opposites.

But balance can be achieved with different dynamics.. A child’s see-saw has a balance – but with big amplitude waves – whereas as we stand we unconsciously make fine adjustments to stay upright.

And of course, opposites are related to each other. They are in a sense part of the same thing; coins with two sides.  Mrs Thatcher was a consequence of Arthur Scarghill – in a way a part of the same system. Donald Trump’s appeal and Daish are parts of systems reacting to each other. Brexit and Boris Johnson is a response to Euro-fanaticism and Jean-Claude Juncker.

Why are the swings in politics so severe now? Is it simply that we have had decades of stability in the west and that we’re due for challenges? Is it the pressure of global population growth? Is it the split between those who have and the rest of humanity?

Whatever, it is the duty of civilised peoples to work to temper the big swings, to be considerate in our language and to see the point of view of the other.

Otherwise, we’ll all fall off the global see-saw together.

Hoi Poloi

Let us fight for the idea of Europe. Let it though be a Europe as a democracy.

The current path is toward a politicracy – rule by and in the interests of the chattering and political elite. What we need, and will happen peacefully or violently – is to get back to rule by hoi poloi.. An Old concept that we seem to be forgetting. Invented in Greece not Brussels. Democracy.

Odd isn’t it that Britain is reviled by the continental political classes as being “uneuropean” . Yet we are the peoples who actually obey the club rules, we are the biggest per capita net contributor 11.3 BIllion euros in 2013 and rising.. And we fought for European freedoms last century.

Britons won’t stand for ever for this nonsense. But. It’s the cosy smoke filled room decision making that must be swept away. Not the concept of cooperation and peaceful non nationalistic communion. Europe as a USA style federal democracy.. not oh NOT rule by Brussels fat cat insiders …

If Europe is not reformed so that the people are re-empowered then I’m rather afraid we’ll have to go through the nasty taste of nationalism again with all of its attendant division and ultimately of violence.

So, let us fight for the ideal of a democratic Europe.

Social movements – sorting the sheep from the goats

It occurs to me that there is a key way in which social, political and religious movements can be separated. Sheep from goats, as it were. It is this – is there a monologue or a conversation? It’s the difference between being preached at or engaged. Whether or ordinary, personal and humble views matter. Put another way – is the first contact – on the one hand inspiration and question – or rather dictation and dogma?

I have some particular views on which are which. They’re mine. If I shared them – it would be dogma. What do you think?

 

Scotland is an idea…

… a dream and a gift. Outgoing, passionate, vibrant, edgy, generous, educated, intellectual, yeasty.

What loss to the world if this were once again to be bound to the rock of jingoism and re-contained in the economics of a small land, with a declining and ageing population on the rainy margins of Europe.